-
Recent Posts
Links
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
Categories
Daily Archives: December 10, 2022
有關創世記第一章中的「日」
By Tin-chee Lo (盧天賜); 12/10/2022 如何將創世記第一章所述的「六日」創造與地層中的化石所指示的「巨大年代」相協調? 地層中的化石和可裂變礦物 (fissionable minerals)指向地球歷史是數十億年之久。而創世記則認為史前的歷史是「六個 24 小時的日子」,而人類的歷史最多是一萬年左右。聖經與地質學呈現巨大的差異,使人們(特別是科學家) 懷疑聖經的可信度。但科學家們中也有異議;本文將分析各家說法,顯示這個 “衝突” 只是外观上的,而不是真實的。 有些聖經學者認為,「完全字面」的解經方法是唯一正確的解經原則。如果聖經真的是無誤並完全地可靠,那麼,現代科學與聖經就絕無調和的可能。 但對「聖經無誤」的真實和正確的信念,是既不涉及「文字的解釋規則」也不涉及「喻意的解釋規則」, 解經者所需要知道的是聖經作者所用詞句的實際含意。 例1: (馬太19:24) 耶穌說, “我又告訴你們、駱駝穿過鍼的眼、比財主進 神的國還容易呢。” 「穿鍼眼」與「進神國」是平行的短句。「穿鍼眼」是人人熟悉的形象。「駱駝穿鍼眼」是修辭形象,說明某事情的難度或不可能性。如果富人對自己的物質財富感到自豪以致不願悔改,依靠上帝,那麼天國就與他無份。這樣的屬靈解釋,大家都公認它是比「絕對字面主義 (absolute literalism)」者的解釋更合理。 例2: (約2:19-21) 當群眾挑戰耶穌行一些神蹟,祂便指着聖殿說, ”你們拆毀這殿、我三日內要再建立起來。” 猶太人便說、”這殿是四十六年纔造成的、你三日內就再建立起來麼。” 但耶穌這話、不是一個字面的預言。祂自己解釋道,「是以他的身體為殿」。當時門徒還是一頭霧水,直至主耶穌復活後,才明白「我三日內要再建立起來」是指主的身體復活 (bodily resurrection)。在圣经诠释上,我們當然支持「字面解經」,但不能與「絕對字面主義 (absolute literalism)」認同 。 當我們打開創世記第一章時, 我們是有責任去盡可能清楚地確定作者 (摩西) 要向我們表達那被聖靈引導所寫下來的語言的意思。如果我們只看頭五個創造日 (創1:3-23) … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment